Certified Respiratory Therapist Practice Exam

Which of the following is NOT a reason to use a single-use catheter during suctioning?

1. Helps reduce bacterial colonization

2. Prevents cross-contamination

3. Is more cost-effective than reusable options

4. Enhances patient safety

The correct answer is: Is more cost-effective than reusable options

Using a single-use catheter during suctioning is primarily focused on patient safety and infection control. These catheters help reduce bacterial colonization and prevent cross-contamination, which is essential in maintaining a sterile environment for patients, especially those who may already be vulnerable or immunocompromised. Such practices are crucial in healthcare settings to minimize the risk of hospital-acquired infections. Imagine a scenario where a reusable catheter is incorrectly processed and retains pathogens; this could lead to detrimental health outcomes for the patient. In contrast, single-use catheters are designed to be discarded after one use, effectively eliminating this risk each time they are utilized, thereby enhancing patient safety. In terms of cost-effectiveness, while single-use catheters may seem more expensive on a per-item basis compared to reusable options, they often lead to decreased healthcare-associated infections and their related costs. This means that while option C suggests they are more cost-effective, in reality, this does not align with the broader goals of safety and infection control inherent in the use of single-use options.